one.point.zero - Colin O'Brien's weblog

Why bother? That really is the big question facing us as individuals hoping to do something about climate change, and it's not an easy one to answer.

Michael Pollan, first-class as always.

It doesn't take a student of psychology to tell us that if you keep moving the goal posts and offer little in the way of hope, then most people will simply give up trying

That's exactly what's happening

if it's clear that the risk is high, people will work together to reach a common goal. But if it's in the balance, then selfishness takes over

selfishness v altruism on climate change

if you care about climate change forget about saving the planet

It's all about the message

Thought-provoking profile of James Lovelock and his definitely funereal outlook for the planet.

How it all ends

How can branding help (or hinder) climate change?

it is a serious distortion to imply, as the top ten lists usually do, that there is any equivalence between these lifestyle preferences and the serious decisions that really reduce emissions

Little efforts do not big changes make

Black Balloon

Geoengineering could work to control climate change but could never stop. A single mistake and things would be worse than when we started.

Companies that are polluting in China are owned by American, European, Japanese and others. They are benefiting from the cheap labour, from the resources and at the same time accusing China of pollution.

Wise words

The only way to survive may now be extraction of greenhouse gases from the air.

California is pioneering what could be the next battleground against global warming: filing suit to hold cities and counties accountable for greenhouse gas emissions caused by poorly planned suburban sprawl.

Incompetence is everywhere, so I guess it’s no surprise that it’s present in the carbon monitoring processes supposed to help in fighting climate change.

Ocean Levels

In the next 24 hours, deforestation will release as much CO2 into the atmosphere as 8 million people flying from London to New York.

major damage from rainforest clearing

Interesting summary of the current dangers of biofuel use as well as future, more sustainable, directions the industry might take.

The rich nations seeking to cut climate change have this in common: they lie

Goverments know they have false figures

Why was The Great Global Warming Swindle so persuasive? Indeed, I regularly see people using that show as an excuse to keep the energy squandering utopia alive.

Interesting interview with James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute, concerning the causes and consequences of global warming.

The latest issue of The Nation focuses on climate change. There are quite a few interesting articles in there, some require a subscription though.

The governments using biofuel to tackle global warming know that it causes more harm than good. But they plough on regardless.

competition between cars and people

Climate change engenders climate change

The mild winter pushed down heating costs in Belgium this year resulting in a record number of people going on holiday during the Easter break thanks to the money saved.

So, basically, warm weather brought on by climate change pushes people to fly and drive long distances, thereby emitting more greenhouse gases than ever which in turn further affect climate change.

I doubt that’s one of the positive feedbacks in the climate system that scientists were fearing, but the outcome is alike.

George Monbiot is one of the many people debunking Channel 4’s sensationalist “The great global warming swindle”. You can view the program here.

Tropical diseases like malaria will spread. By 2050, polar bears will mostly be found in zoos, their habitats gone. Pests like fire ants will thrive.

From next month's climate report

It’s 2056 and the planet is saved. I just laughed watching this, probably not the expected reaction.

Green will never get any sexier than it is in 2007. Because, after this, brown will start going away.

Sterling on technology as saviour

Well I hadn’t thought of that one to fight climate change, let’s use the secret technology from Roswell.

The technology exists, perhaps, but the political will and the economic reality doesn't. That reality dictates that stopping climate change is nigh on impossible

Are we all in denial?

As if things weren’t crazy enough, some people are installing snow-making machines in their gardens.

A sobering if not downright alarming view from Dmitry Orlov of the possible future that awaits us in a world of resource depletion and global warming

When a scientist talks about reducing greenhouse gas emissions ... he or she means just that; actually reducing them. But what it is coming to mean in the political lexicon is something very different

The semantics of climate change

Scientists and economists have been offered $10,000 each by an Exxon-funded lobby group to undermine a major climate change report due to be published today.

Head, meet sand

Thanks to all the people who’ve been endlessly forwarding me an invitation to switch off the lights tomorrow for a few minutes before 8pm in order to “create global awareness of the climate and energy situation”. You can stop now, really.

If you want to act, switch the damn things off most of the time and use low-energy bulbs when you can’t. Don’t leave your TV on standby, don’t drive you car to the corner shop, take the heating down a notch, give up on flying halfway across the world just because you can.

You know the story, but you don’t want to hear it. It’s much easier to participate in some feel-good action than actually doing something. The problem with doing something being that you have to sacrifice some of that comfort you’ve gotten so used to.

Have a good answer ready when your kids ask you why you didn’t do anything even though you knew, because that question is coming.

It’s not about going back to the stone age, just making some adjustments. We’re all guilty of not doing enough, but let’s at least do something with a bit more impact than being in the dark for 5 minutes. Every time I get that email I’m reminded of a BMW X5 I recently saw sporting a Greenpeace sticker.

And now, the weather forecast

The BBC’s distributed climate change experiment is over.

250.000 computers crunched away at the numbers and came up with a scenario for the near future: Summer temperatures will easily reach 40°C and heatwaves will be frequent. Winters will be warmer but also much wetter. Storms will be frequent and intense.

Recent weather patterns seem to confirm that direction.

A snowball’s chance in hell

Ski resorts across Europe, usually blanketed by snow at this time of the year, are desperately void of the white stuff. Many are blaming global warming.

So what do they go and do? Setup snow canons all over the place to compensate artificially. Snow canons that use massive amounts of energy and huge quantities of water. Talk about the snake eating its own tail…

The idea that you can go out and plant a tree and help reverse global warming is an appealing, feel-good thing

The truth about carbon offsets

Blame nature. Blame lesbians. Blame the Chinese, blame anybody, but not us, not during our lifetime.

Bruce Sterling on climate change denial

Texas-based Exxon is trying to influence opinion-makers in Brussels because Europe - rather than the US - is the driving force for action on climate change.

How low can Exxon go

SNCF Travel in France have added a CO2 emissions comparison tool to their booking site.

Hollywood is the second largest polluter in the Los Angeles area. The full report is online. (thanks Dimitri)

I try not to go down that road but I’m afraid I tend to agree a lot with this article (apart from the last 2 paragraphs, I think it’ll be nasty, but I don’t wish for it).

Placing a wind turbine on your roof will make a great fashion statement to your neighbours but won’t help much in reducing your emissions. On the other hand, the less sexy option of insulation will have a much stronger effect.

Thought-provoking article from the BBC’s John Humprys on global warming, his parents, and the paradoxes in trying to be green.

We’ve got 10 years to avoid dangerous climate changes. At the moment, it’s not looking too great...

Fear of (climate) change

There’s an argument taking place at the Climate Ark.

This guy’s daughter gets scared by climate change, so he goes ranting against scientists in the comments there. I had a bit of compassion for the guy’s hot-headed reaction until I read his second comment. Sadly, many people think like him.

An opposing view to the Stern Report. It’s authored by Bjorn Lomborg, who’s no stranger to controversy.

The principal costs of climate change will be measured in lives, not pounds

Monbiot's suggestions for climate survival

The Stern report was finally featured on Belgian TV news last night. When asked what Belgium was doing to reduce emissions and curb climate change, the prime minister said they would be taxing packaging and pushing the use of biofuels. I feel so much safer now

In 2004, the North Atlantic drift actually stopped for 10 days. If you aren’t scared yet… (Thanks Kevin)Update: the story is debunked at RealClimate.

That’s going to hurt

A report on global warming by the British treasury says it will be cheaper for developed nations to tackle the problem with significant cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, than to deal with the consequences later. Duh.

With most politicians looking no further than their own noses the next elections, I doubt that will kickstart anything except a few empty promises.

Meanwhile, Belgium is part of the 7 European countries that will exceed their individual emission limits. No big surprise there either, they’re too busy trying to cause a depression down south before climate change does it for them.

A student moving to the UK from the US decided to give up flying and get to his destination without planes or cars. His weblog describes how he did it. I admit I’ve been eyeing a transatlantic journey on a cargo ship for a while now although I need to figure out the damage that does.

Just as in the 15th and 16th centuries you could sleep with your sister and kill and lie without fear of eternal damnation, today you can live exactly as you please as long as you give your ducats to one of the companies selling indulgences

Amusing analogy for carbon offset schemes

And the first victim of climate change is… the frog.

the day when we use more than our fair share of the Earth - when 'humanity starts eating the planet' is October 9

they say the future starts today

Some experts are saying one third of the planet will be desert by the year 2100. And, of course, developing countries will be the most affected.

Asleep at the wheel

A new study from NASA shows that the world’s temperature is reaching a level that hasn’t been seen in thousands of years. Basically, if we don’t change things radically now, we risk being in really deep shit.

The optimist in me keeps hoping lots of us will have a revelation and change our habits drastically, but I fear we’ll just keep on our motoring, flying and general resource-depleting fiesta until we can’t. And then we’ll pull our head out of the sand and blame someone else…

By 2020, 2025, you will be able to sail a sailboat to the North Pole. The Amazon will become a desert, and the forests of Siberia will burn and release more methane and plagues will return

James Lovelock doesn't see a bright future

An ad for Nissan 4×4’s that looks like it was filmed in the future. Barren landscapes, nasty weather, no vegetation… thanks to all that greenhouse gas they contribute to.

Al Gore will be present in Brussels on October 8th to introduce his film: An inconvenient truth.

Eco-fatalism is for wimps (but I still wouldn’t call nuclear power one of the solutions).

The Empty Tank (Jeremy Leggett)

cover

Jeremy Leggett is a geologist who worked inside the big oil companies for years before jumping ship to Greenpeace and finally setting up his own renewable energy company. In this book, he lays out his arguments for an early peak in oil production combined with the ongoing climate crisis and their implications on our way of life. He doesn't paint a pretty picture but the facts are there and his insider knowledge tends to confirm the well-held beliefs that changes will not come from above. He sees future energy prices and lack of forward-thinking pushing us back into exploiting coal and other dirty fuels, thus accelerating climate and economic instability. It's not all gloom though, he sees renewable energy setting us back on track but only after crossing a very depressive post-cheap-oil era. Basically: we'll fall right down before we can stand up again. Worth the read if only for the insider oil stories. Note: this book is also sold under the title 'half gone'. [link]

We used to think that it would take 10,000 years for melting at the surface of an ice sheet to penetrate down to the bottom. Now we know it doesn't take 10,000 years; it takes 10 seconds

Climate change will not be gradual

the great droughts which had devastated the Sahel region of Africa had been caused in part by sulphate pollution in Europe and North America.

Monbiot on the dangers of geoengineering

Removing CFCs from aerosol cans has led to their replacements contributing to climate change. We’re like a snake eating its own tail.

We're cooking our planet to refrigerate the diminishing part that's still habitable

The deluded world of air conditioning

Truly amazing: the oil industry pays for dumb/boring viral video smearing Al Gore. They must feel extremely threatened.

Global warming is showing the limits of nuclear power plants, and nuclear power is destroying our environment

Stephane Lhomme on the heat wave

I guess I’m dealing in climate porn too. Things are so enormous they probably do provoke a fight or flight reaction in most people though.

Could global warming kill the Internet? Yup.

A complete list of things caused by global warming

The BBC asks leading experts for their forecasts on cities of the future. Recurring themes are polarisation between those who have and those who don’t, climate change and energy problems.

Dear Mr Barroso, have you ever heard of practicing what you preach? Obviously not.

We know that our elected leaders and the corporate interests they represent are not going to lead the way to the change we need; they are in fact our main obstacles. Despite being in full possession of the facts, they want to carry on making it worse.

Bristling Badger on climate change